Christopher Blay and Christina Rees discuss how a recent national report about culturally vibrant cities, which only counted one Texas region among its top 40 places, impacts our ideas about the state and its artists.
“I still don’t know how this report necessarily reflects the real, on-the-ground working lives and experiences of the people who make these places ‘culturally vibrant.'”
To play the podcast, click on the orange play button below. You can also listen to it here. You can also find Glasstire on Apple Podcasts.
If you enjoy Glasstire and would like to support our work, please consider donating. As a nonprofit, all of the money we receive goes back into our coverage of Texas art. You can make a one-time donation or become a sustaining, monthly donor here.
—Glasstire: Art Dirt: The Personalities of Texas’ Art Cities
—Glasstire: Austin-Round Rock is (Again) Only Texas City in Top 40 on SMU DataArts Arts’ Vibrant Communities Index
—Arts Vibrancy Index Report 2020
—Glasstire: Five New Cultural Districts Designated by Texas Commission on the Arts
—Glasstire:Art Dirt: Is It Time for Texas Art to Get Hyperlocal?
—Glasstire: Art Dirt:Art Dirt: Is Texas an International Art Destination?
Thanks for the excellent discussion. Oh, to have been around 50 years earlier! Before the recent waves of commodification of all things drive out low-paid creatives from every place made “cool”. I think living and working *affordably* is the key in reality and certainly is in your dialogue! Let’s hope where I live and places like it can remain off the radar, but their attributes revealed…