Inspired by recently unveiled controversial portraits of King Charles III and Catherine, Princess of Wales, Brandon Zech and Gabriel Martinez discuss portraiture’s privileged place in art history.
“For the entire history of portraiture, the goal has been to depict the person as they are because it has been the only way for us to be able to tell how people looked. But now that images of famous people can be ubiquitously found on the internet, artists have a little more freedom to play with the idea of what a portrait is.”
To play the podcast, click on the orange play button below. You can also find Glasstire on Apple Podcasts and on Spotify.
This week’s podcast is sponsored in part by the Center for the Advancement and Study of Early Texas Art (CASETA), which will present their Annual Symposium and Texas Art Fair from June 21-23 at the DoubleTree by Hilton – Greenway Plaza Hotel in Houston. The event will feature a variety of lectures and conversations revolving around Early Texas Art, along with an accompanying art fair. To see a complete list of events and register for the program, please go here.
Related Readings:
—NPR: The controversy over King Charles’ portrait
—New Yorker: Why Does the New Kate Middleton Portrait Look Nothing Like Her?
—CNN: Michelle Obama’s official portrait looks nothing like her
—Glasstire: The Unfinished Portrait of General Bonaparte and the Art of Incomplete Masterpieces
—Glasstire: Redefining the Portrait: “The Sitter” at Blue Star Contemporary
—Glasstire: Making a Phenomenon: Talking with Nestor Topchy
—Glasstire: Four Texas Artists Among National Portrait Gallery’s 2022 Outwin Competition Finalists
—Glasstire: American Portraiture Today: Isolation, Immigration, and Identity
—Glasstire: Breaking the Boundaries of Expression: A Conversation with Oliver Freeston about Queer Portraiture
—New Yorker: Portraits of Power
—Chairish: A Complete History Of Portraiture And Its Artists