That’s not the title for Paul H-O’s new documentary, but it could be. Here’s an entertaining interview with him on Salon.
At the bottom of the page there was a link to a 1999 interview with Matt Collings , which is an ok introduction (some pretty lame questions in there). He makes some interesting observations, as always.
"I’m a pure insider.
I’m not at all a secular critic. Every strata of my being is the art
world. I was born into it. I don’t have any outside-the-art-world-ness."
I’m not at all a secular critic. Every strata of my being is the art
world. I was born into it. I don’t have any outside-the-art-world-ness."
1 comment
here were a number of reasons why the shot proved so difficult to accomplish and is so studied by film students. The shot needed to be taken in the evening towards dusk to minimize the light difference between interior and exterior. Since the shot was continuous, it was not possible to adjust the lens aperture at the moment when the camera passed from the room to the square. As such, the scene could only be shot between 5:00 and 7:30 in the evening.