I was going to do a snide blog mocking the letter from the editor in a recent issue of ArtForum. I had the witticisms all lined up about it being a glistening slab of whale blubber that flops into my PO box every month, fat as a tick on the blood of sad, desperate galleries and artists who will pay anything, anything to get a full page ad in there, even if the work is shit and who cares anyway, and meanwhile the people behind it are wringing their hands about being part of the corrupting commercialism in the art world, but maybe that’s cool anyway, since commercialism is art nowadays (original), so they just hold their noses all the way to the bank…
But I think I’d rather be positive and talk about Matthew Collings.
I got lucky recently and stumbled into a subscription to Modern Painters (thank you Rachel Cook!), and in the two issues I’ve received have become an insta-fan of Collings, who does a regular column at the front of the book. (Yes, Collings is already super-famous as a Turner Prize critic, among other things, and I’m late to the game in finding his musings compelling.)
In the current issue, Collings basically says that the paintings of Gary Wragg (who?) are better than those of his former student and 11 million dollar man Peter Doig (whose paintings — if you need the reminder — are, according to Wikipedia, “among Europe’s most expensive”).
The magazine graciously reproduces two large images of paintings by each artist, so you can compare and contrast.
I admit to glancing at the pictures and disliking Wragg’s work before I even read the piece, and liking Doig’s stuff, before realizing it was his work. Collings suggests that such predictable reactions are the result of a taste that’s been shaped by the fashions of the art world, and that the opportunity for chaos in Wragg’s more colorful, abstract and expressionistic paintings is better than Doig’s dreamy figures and landscapes executed in a tasteful, muted colorway. I’m paraphrasing.
Here was my train of thought upon reading this:
1. “My God, he’s right. I have been blinded by the collective, brainless art world. I am in lockstep with people I thought were The Other.”
2. “Wait a minute. These Wragg paintings are weak, and even a gifted writer taking the unique tack of praising them over the hyper-hyped Doig isn’t going to strengthen them.”
3. “Hm. Maybe I don’t like either of these guys’ work. Maybe this is all a lot of high falutin’ nonsense about work that doesn’t deserve attention to begin with…<gasp> like ArtForum!!!”
I haven’t resolved what I think about Collings’ krazy unorthodoxy. The point is, I’m still thinking about it.
also by Rainey Knudson
- As Moths to the Light: Pipilotti Rist at the MFAH - June 18th, 2017
- This and That: Andy Warhol / Tiger Woods - June 5th, 2017
- Why We Need Boring Old Textile Shows Now More Than Ever - May 21st, 2017
- Autumn Knight: Directions to Prairie View - May 8th, 2017
- Ron Hoover: Modern Business Shadows - April 2nd, 2017