Making the Scene

If you’ve ever taken a nineteenth or twentieth-century art history
class, you probably felt a little bit inundated by the parade of
“-isms,” movements, and schools that generally shape how we think about
art.

Ward Lockwood teaching a UT art class


Attach a few artists’ names and stylistic traits to these
headings, and you’re ready for the exam (or, perhaps, the museum),
where images of paintings loom on a screen (or a white wall), devoid of
context, ready for your appreciation.

But rather than movements and schools, did anyone ever test your knowledge of a scene?

In contrast with a “movement” or a “school,” a “scene” describes a much looser association of individuals. A scene doesn’t have a leader so much as people who are more or less influential than others. There are the “insiders,” the “fringe dwellers,” and the “outsiders,” a mix of people who fall in and out of the group, but there has to be, in general, something that ties these people together. In the case of art, it might be as simple as a specific place, and a specific time.


AMOA-Laguna Gloria’s
current exhibition, Austin Art Seen, circa 1961, describes a “scene” above all else. Despite the exhibition’s title, the show includes prints, drawings, paintings and sculpture made by seventeen artists from the 1940s through the 1960s, a time when Austin was at the center of the Texas art world. The work in the show might be loosely characterized as modern or abstract, but the artists featured here never signed a group manifesto, and no contemporary curator (or one since) ever canonized them as a “school” or “movement”. Instead, curator Carl R. McQueary’s selections from local collections offer a glimpse of a visual landscape, a slice of the creative foment that swept Austin during the mid-twentieth century.

The Foundation Laid

From top to bottom:...Michael Frary, Straight and Curved...Everett Spruce, Untitled Abstract...Constance Forsyth...Grackles...1956...Watercolor...21 x 16 1/4 inches...Collection of Carl R. McQueary


While a scene may be a loose descriptor, Austin’s had a definite spark: the establishment, in 1938, of an art department at the University of Texas encompassing studio art, art history, and art education. Of course, there had been artists living in Austin before there was an art department. In fact, the Austin-based Texas Fine arts Association [TFAA] had been lobbying for the creation of one for years. But the university attracted such a diverse and talented group of instructors, as well as students, that the course of art in Austin was irrevocably changed. This shift, however, did not happen all at once. During the nearly twenty-five years between its founding and 1961, the art department underwent transformations of its own even as it fostered the larger Austin art scene.

Though neither artist is featured in Austin Art Seen, the art department’s founding faculty members undeniably set the tone for the years ahead. The department’s first chair, Ward Lockwood, and first instructor, Loren Mozley, came to Austin from New Mexico, where they had been living in Taos, home of a thriving artists’ colony with strong ties to European art. Both artists studied in Paris during the 1920s, where they were exposed to all of the “-isms” taking shape at the time, including Cubism, Dada, and Surrealism. In Taos, each found a group of artists committed to personal development, questioning established norms, and finding their own way through these revolutions in art making. Lockwood and Mozley took these ideals with them to Austin, and soon were joined by a group of prominent artists who helped mold the UT art department during its early years, including the painters Everett Spruce and William Lester, the sculptor Charles Umlauf, and the printmaker Constance Forsyth. Although Lockwood would leave UT for good in 1947 to teach at the University of California, Berkeley, these other early faculty members taught at UT for as many as forty years.

Spruce and Lester spent the early part of their careers in Dallas, the hub for so-called “regionalist” art in Texas during the Depression years. Of all the department’s early faculty members, the work of these two reveals the impact of intense experimentation and critical inquiry both encouraged and made possible by the university environment. The harsh realities of the dust bowl, depicted in their earlier paintings with an earth-toned palette, gave way to brighter colors and a shift in each painter’s style soon after they arrived at UT. Lester focused on breaking down his subjects into flat planes of color with architectonic compositions that express what he termed “structural reality.” Spruce leaned more toward expressionism in paintings that channel the motion and life evident in nature. Neither artist completely abandoned his “regionalist” roots, instead combining earlier subject matter with cubist elements and more expressive brushwork. The result is another “regionalism” engaged with modernist rather than social realist art.

The Transformation

From left to right:...Ralph White, Michael Frary,...Constance Forsyth, Kelly Fearing,...Charles Umlauf, Everett Spruce,...Seymour Fogel, Donald Weismann


If the university had an impact on the art department’s new faculty, these artists also brought Austin and UT to national attention through their participation in exhibitions around Texas and throughout the United States. Lockwood, Forsyth, Umlauf, and Spruce all exhibited in New York City within their first few years at UT, including at the National Academy of Design, the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Museum of Modern Art. Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and other cities also saw the work of Austin’s new arrivals. Within Texas, these artists participated in various gallery and museum shows, as well as in the annual juried Texas General exhibition, mounted cooperatively by the Dallas Museum of Fine Arts, the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, and the Witte Memorial Museum in San Antonio. Especially in the case of artists recruited from outside of Texas, these exhibitions allowed Austin artists to add their new creative energy to the state’s artistic culture. UT faculty also participated in local art shows as jurors, including the TFAA’s annual juried exhibition, the Texas Circuit. All of this energy not only drew attention, but also more artists, to the university. As Robert Summers and Chelsea Weathers note in their extensive paper on the UT art department’s history, “the express purpose of the new college was to produce exceptional visual artists for the state, and the popularity and success of the faculty attracted students and more faculty to the University, and therefore to Texas.”

The initial wave of artists arrived in Austin during the first five years classes were offered at UT’s art department; a second wave arrived soon after the end of World War II, when enrollment in art schools across the country skyrocketed. While the entire College of Fine arts had only 109 students in 1938, enrollment in the art department alone jumped to 574 students by 1945. As the department ballooned, classes were moved from Battle Hall and the Main Building, east to where the Geology and Winship Drama Buildings now stand. Army barracks leftover from the war housed classes and studios for fifteen years. New faculty hired to help the department keep up with increasing demand include the painters Ralph White and Seymour Fogel in 1946, Ft. Worth artist and art educator Kelly Fearing in 1947, ceramist and metalworker Paul Hatgil in 1951, printmaker and watercolorist John Guerin in 1953, and painter Michael Frary in 1954. Donald Weismann, a painter, art historian, and art educator, became the department’s first non-studio art chair in 1954.

Seymour Fogel...Untitled Abstract


If this list seems unnecessarily long, it is in the service of emphasizing the explosion of artistic energy that infused Austin within a relatively short amount of time. The diversity that characterizes the work of these artists may make a tidy, coherent survey impossible, but reveling in its variety is equally rewarding. For example, take Ralph White, Kelly Fearing, and Michael Frary, another trio of artists who taught at UT for thirty-plus years each. While White engaged in a sustained inquiry into painting techniques and extreme abstraction, Frary’s work ranged from lyrical watercolors to eerie, invented landscapes in oil that are infused with surreal qualities. During the 1950s and 60s, Fearing painted many figures in craggy landscapes, including saints and other Biblical characters, as well as a variety of animals, especially owls. Fearing’s magical realism, Frary’s watercolors, and White’s abstractions do not add up to a movement or school in the traditional sense, but taken together, their paintings might tell us something about working in a specific place through a particular period of time. This is one of the pleasures of Austin Art Seen.

McQueary has organized exhibitions of work by UT faculty members in the past – notably a duo of shows at the Umlauf Sculpture Garden & Museum in 2004 and 2005, both titled Modernist – and with Austin Art Seen he apparently aims to engage artists outside of the university’s mid-20th-century pantheon of professors. For example, he has included work by William Hoey, Louise LaBauve, and Don Snell, all of whom studied at UT, and in Hoey’s case, taught there as well. Amy Freeman Lee spent most of her life in San Antonio but was involved with the university and exhibited around the state, in addition to being a close friend of several faculty members, including Kelly Fearing. While drawing more than half of the artists in the exhibition from UT’s faculty, then, McQueary has also ventured further a field to make up his “scene.” Even so, each artist in the exhibition nevertheless had some sort of tie to UT, putting the university squarely at the center of the art world portrayed in the exhibition.

The Next Generation

Kelly Fearing...Selectivity of the Wearer of the Masks...1948...14 x 11 inches...Collection of Carl R. McQueary


In many ways, the early 1960s were a time of transition for the Austin art scene: Austin Art Seen marks the end of one era, and the beginning of another. It was around this time that the Art School at Laguna Gloria was founded. In 1961, Laguna Gloria Art Museum was established as a separate chapter of TFAA. The museum assumed responsibility for organizing exhibitions at the Driscoll Villa, which had been deeded to TFAA in 1942. TFAA continued to hold three exhibitions annually in the main building at Laguna Gloria until 1998, when it opened new headquarters on Congress Avenue in downtown Austin (in 2002, TFAA officially changed its name to Arthouse). Meanwhile, Laguna Gloria joined with two other local cultural organizations in 1992 to form the Austin Museum of Art, which moved its primary exhibition space downtown in 1996.

At the university, the department added master’s degrees in studio art, art education, and art history to its curriculum in 1960. At the time of its twenty-fifth anniversary, the department moved into the new Art Building at the corner of 23rd and San Jacinto Streets. Exhibitions that had been mounted in various locations on campus since the department’s inception finally had a permanent home inside this building at the University Art Museum, which was renamed the Archer M. Huntington Gallery in 1980, and subsequently became the Jack S. Blanton Museum of Art in 1997.

Ralph White...Red Woman...1961...Collection of Carl R. McQueary


Besides these institutional changes, artists’ work was changing, too. In 1971, Loren Mozley described the current Austin art scene by giving voice to the shifts that had already taken place: “Austin has been the home of several first-rate painters and sculptors in recent years and has produced a succession of younger talents, but there has never been an “Austin School” or any group of artists living here who shared a common style or aesthetic. The character of the local expression now seems to be changing, however, and although the exhibition catalogues may continue to list the familiar names of those who paint pictures and make sculpture, the community includes a number of young craftsmen and artists who work in media and concepts far outside our former notions of the limits of painting and sculpture.” Clearly, the new artistic revolutions of the 1960s had taken hold in Austin. Abstraction—once a signifier of avant-garde art and the dominant trend in Austin art making throughout the 1940s and 1950s—had become the norm, only to be replaced by another series of artistic challenges.

Mozley retired from teaching a few years after he made these observations. Between 1972 and 1975, all of the first generation UT faculty (except Umlauf) had retired, each one as Professor Emeritus. Umlauf followed in 1981, becoming the leading edge of second-generation retirees. Kelly Fearing, the last early faculty member to leave the classroom, retired Professor Emeritus in 1987. One year later, the art department celebrated its fiftieth anniversary. The days of leaky army barracks and nomadic art exhibitions weren’t even a distant memory for most, if not all, those teaching at the university. The scene had changed, as it inevitably does.

This article was originally published in the Austin Chronicle

Images courtesy of Carl R. McQueary and Robert Summers


Amanda Douberley
is associate curator of the Bobbie and John Nau Collection
of Texas Art, Houston.

also by Amanda Douberley

Print Friendly

11 responses to “Making the Scene”

  1. There’s not a good painting in the article. Does this have anything to do with art today at all, or is any of this midcentury work good? Is Austin just navel-gazing? Masturbatory.

  2. “Does this have anything to do with art today at all?” First of all where does it say that every article needs to relate back to the art being made today. Are you just navel-gazing and masturbatory?

  3. i thought that was the premise of glasstire…

  4. “Glasstire is an online journal of visual art in Texas, founded in 2001 to encourage awareness of, and dialogue about, Texas visual art.” Plus I believe you need to look back in history to understand where you came from and where you are now, which relates back to art being made today.

  5. alright, so it is relevant to Texas art today… right. Can’t wait for the next one!

  6. Or did you just scan and look at the images?

  7. I read it, although I did skim through the long lists in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs.

  8. Have you ever been around TX or seen what Austin is like?

  9. yes, i’ve been to austin and visited art spaces. i’ve been to dallas, san antonio and el paso too.

  10. Another, probably equally vibrant scene in the 40s – 60s was the Fort Worth School (and for a shorter period, the Dallas Nine).

  11. For those interested in Seymour Fogel’s work, the site below may be informative and interesting.

    http://sites.google.com/site/seymourfogelart/

    The site has been created based upon the input of other Fogel admirers, so keep the good information coming!

Leave a Reply